Comparison Tool

Carlyle Group vs TPG vs Warburg Pincus

Side-by-side comparison of fund managers. Analyze AUM, strategy, health scores, team size, and track record.

MetricCarlyle GroupTPGWarburg Pincus
AUM$420B$220B$82000.0T
Primary StrategyReal EstateReal EstateCredit
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited StatesUS
Founded198719921966
Employees393176232
Investment ProfessionalsN/AN/AN/A
Ownershippublicpublicindependent
Outside StakeYesYesNo
Stakeability Score59%55%59%
Team Stability41%41%41%
Growth Score75%58%54%
Funds Tracked16332864
Avg Fund IRR10.4%14.2%15.0%
Websitehttps://www.carlyle.comhttps://www.tpg.comhttps://www.warburgpincus.com

Which GP is better for your portfolio?

The right GP depends on your investment objectives, risk tolerance, and portfolio construction needs. Consider strategy fit, track record consistency, team stability, and alignment of interests when evaluating managers. GP Stakes provides comprehensive data to support your due diligence process.

For Capital Preservation

Look for higher team stability scores, longer track records, and established institutional relationships.

For Growth Exposure

Prioritize growth scores, recent fund vintage performance, and hiring activity signals.

For GP Stakes Investment

Focus on stakeability scores, ownership structure, AUM growth trajectory, and fee revenue stability.

Need Deeper Analysis?

Get access to detailed health scores, fund-level performance, and proprietary stakeability metrics.

Get Full Access